Technology Expert Witness  ·  Weiner.Net LLC  ·  New York, NY

Bruce Weiner

Bruce Weiner is a software expert witness, testifying and consulting in technology, product development, and software engineering. Federal courts · State courts · PTAB · Arbitration · MDL · Class Action

30+ Prior Matters | 10+ Depositions | With live testimony experience | Technology since 1988 | Princeton BSE EE/CS

Areas of Opinion

Why Attorneys Retain a Technology Expert Witness

SDLC & Product Governance

Software development lifecycle practices, Agile/Scrum governance, product management standards, and project delivery conformance evaluated against IEEE SWEBOK and ISO/IEC 25010.

Complex Software Vendor Disputes

SaaS implementation failures, vendor performance disputes, software development contract conformance, and banking software matters. Active in federal court and arbitration proceedings.

Patent Infringement & PTAB

IPR and CBM proceedings, patent validity, non-obviousness in software domains. Cited in Federal Circuit opinion at 986 F.3d 1367 (cxLoyalty v. Maritz).

Platform & Web Architecture

High-traffic e-commerce platforms, mobile app architecture, API design, SEO, and internet-facing systems. Direct CTO experience at United.com and UAL Loyalty Services.

Airline, Affiliate & Loyalty Technology

Airline technology, affiliate program architecture, loyalty platform design, stored-value and points systems. Named inventor on US Patent 7,203,734. CTO at Brierley & Partners (WPP).

AI, Trade Secrets & Governance

AI platform governance, algorithmic product design, and trade secret misappropriation in software/AI contexts. Active in MDL and class action matters involving AI-enabled platforms.

Representative Matters

Selected Case Experience

Class Action · SDLC · Consumer Technology

Consumer Tenant-Screening Class Action [Anonymized]

N.D. Georgia · Class Action · 2024

Testifying expert in a class action examining SDLC practices and product governance for a consumer-facing tenant screening platform. Opined on conformance to industry standards for software quality and data handling.

PTAB · Federal Circuit · Loyalty Technology

cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings Inc.

PTAB CBM2018-00037

Testifying expert for Patent Owner Maritz Holdings. Opined on loyalty program transaction-processing methodology as a genuine technological invention.

SEO · Platform Architecture · Rebuttal

Dutch Clips LLC v. Ripstop by the Roll, LLC

Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County PA · CI-21-01098 · 2024–26

Testifying expert for Defendant. Rebuttal of plaintiff’s expert on SEO feasibility, software lifecycle governance, and Shopify platform architecture.

Airline Technology · Platform · Anonymized

Airline Loyalty Technology Platform Dispute [Anonymized]

Federal District Court · 2024–26

Testifying expert in a technology platform dispute involving a major airline loyalty program. Opined on platform architecture standards and SDLC conformance to industry standards.

MDL · AI Platform · Mobile App Governance

Gig Economy Transportation MDL [Anonymized]

N.D. California · Multidistrict Litigation · 2023–26

Testifying expert in a major MDL opining on AI platform architecture, mobile app UX governance, and software engineering standards for a gig economy transportation platform. 

Gig Economy · Platform · King County WA

MacDonald v. Horton and DoorDash, Inc.

King County Superior Court WA · 23-2-14619-1 KNT · 2026

Testifying expert opining on gig economy platform architecture, software product governance, and mobile app design standards.

PTAB · IPR · Internet Retail · Affiliate Technology

Amber.io, Inc. v. 72Lux, Inc. d/b/a Shoppable.com

PTAB · IPR2020-00015 · 2020–21

Testifying expert defending patent validity for Patent Owner 72LUX/Shoppable in an inter partes review. Opined on novelty and technical distinctiveness of internet retail affiliate-program software.

Arbitration · Banking Software · Complex Commercial

Commercial Bank v. Banking Software Provider [Anonymized]

Confidential Arbitration Proceeding

Testifying expert in a complex commercial dispute involving implementation of core-banking and internet-banking software. Opined on vendor performance and conformance to software engineering standards.

Approach

Methodology & Standards Anchor

My opinions are grounded in systematic technical review — not forensic analysis. I evaluate whether a party's technical actions conformed to industry standards for reasonable care, technical feasibility, and software quality.

Since 1988, building and leading large-scale software systems at United Airlines, American Express, Brierley & Partners, and Booz Allen, I bring direct hands-on perspective to every standard I apply. I hold A-CSPO and CAL 1 credentials from the Scrum Alliance, and active IEEE and ACM membership since 2018.

I do not perform digital forensics or chain-of-custody analysis. My opinions are grounded in software engineering and technology systems standards; where my analysis intersects with quantifiable technical impacts — such as infrastructure costs, per-transaction contract charges, or system capacity — I address those as a technology expert reading technical evidence, not as an independent damages economist.

IEEEIEEE 730, 1012, SWEBOK — software quality assurance, verification & validation, and engineering body of knowledge
ACMACM Code of Ethics, Computing Curricula — professional computing standards and practice norms
ISO/IEC 25010Software product quality model — functionality, reliability, usability, security, maintainability, portability
Daubert / Rule 702Testable methodology, peer-reviewed standards, known error rates, general acceptance
Scrum AllianceA-CSPO, CSPO, CAL 1 — authoritative SDLC and product development governance credentials

Get in Touch

Ready to discuss your matter?

I accept engagements from plaintiff and defense counsel. Initial consultations are confidential. Schedule a call or text Bruce directly to discuss your case.

Contact Options

Text 646-701-2012

Text Bruce to discuss your case

— or —